<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angry Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/</link>
	<description>Chemically-enhanced neural rewiring, on a semi-regular basis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-540654</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-540654</guid>
		<description>Absolutely love it and really wish the guy would have kept commenting. People like this are utterly priceless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely love it and really wish the guy would have kept commenting. People like this are utterly priceless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539939</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539939</guid>
		<description>[Re: Maize5&#039;s last comment and why it was removed]

So all it took was for me to ask people to keep the conversation on a civilised tone for somebody to take a shot at the Multi-Godwin point.

Maize5: I am afraid you have drawn the wrong conclusions from the, admittedly hyperbolic, treatment given in the original post above... I don&#039;t care what your opinions are: if you cannot formulate them on a public forum without resorting immediately to aggressive stereotyping, you are probably better off shouting stuff in front of your TV set. As far as I know, toyotabedzrock made his comment in a composed manner and didn&#039;t go &lt;i&gt;ad hominem&lt;/i&gt; on anybody, I expect you or anybody else to respond in a similar way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Re: Maize5's last comment and why it was removed]</p>
<p>So all it took was for me to ask people to keep the conversation on a civilised tone for somebody to take a shot at the Multi-Godwin point.</p>
<p>Maize5: I am afraid you have drawn the wrong conclusions from the, admittedly hyperbolic, treatment given in the original post above&#8230; I don&#8217;t care what your opinions are: if you cannot formulate them on a public forum without resorting immediately to aggressive stereotyping, you are probably better off shouting stuff in front of your TV set. As far as I know, toyotabedzrock made his comment in a composed manner and didn&#8217;t go <i>ad hominem</i> on anybody, I expect you or anybody else to respond in a similar way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539553</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539553</guid>
		<description>great response.  amazing how people can react to something that is supposed to help!  If this person would just have taken the time to listen....sigh.  some people really do appreciate work that helps fight spamming - really!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great response.  amazing how people can react to something that is supposed to help!  If this person would just have taken the time to listen&#8230;.sigh.  some people really do appreciate work that helps fight spamming &#8211; really!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toyotabedzrock</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539436</link>
		<dc:creator>toyotabedzrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539436</guid>
		<description>Sorry it is entirely my fault. I read your other post and I liked it. I only hope no nation ever uses another nuclear weapon. And I hope that stories such as your lawyers will be preserved so that future generations can learn from the mistakes everyone made.

Just don&#039;t classify all or even most Americans as warmongers. It is however very exhausting to deal with those Americans who are, they are loud and seem to have unlimited energy to promote there very misguided views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry it is entirely my fault. I read your other post and I liked it. I only hope no nation ever uses another nuclear weapon. And I hope that stories such as your lawyers will be preserved so that future generations can learn from the mistakes everyone made.</p>
<p>Just don&#8217;t classify all or even most Americans as warmongers. It is however very exhausting to deal with those Americans who are, they are loud and seem to have unlimited energy to promote there very misguided views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539361</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539361</guid>
		<description>@toyotabedzrock et al.

Gee, that&#039;s what I get for having some old silly rant featured on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://emailsfromcrazypeople.com/2009/07/16/i-invoke-the-power-of-the-fcc/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Funneh Website&lt;/a&gt; (that and the complete meltdown of my subpar hosting setup)...

People, read the date this was posted on, will you? This post here is &lt;em&gt;four&lt;/em&gt; year old. It wasn&#039;t meant to be particularly witty or deep and served no other purpose than venting some frustration at a moronic user handpicked from the weekly dozen who used to send me complaint emails back then. As such, I really have little inclination to open a debate around the content of this post, even less about a not-so-funny-at-all crack alluding to the use of nuclear weapons on civilian population. But feel free to keep  arguing on this page (just keep it somewhat courteous): I am all for spirited (if slightly pointless) debate.

For the record, I wrote about the topic in a &lt;em&gt;non-humorous&lt;/em&gt; entry elsewhere on this blog:
http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/08/06/anniversary/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@toyotabedzrock et al.</p>
<p>Gee, that&#8217;s what I get for having some old silly rant featured on a <a href="http://emailsfromcrazypeople.com/2009/07/16/i-invoke-the-power-of-the-fcc/#comments" rel="nofollow">Funneh Website</a> (that and the complete meltdown of my subpar hosting setup)&#8230;</p>
<p>People, read the date this was posted on, will you? This post here is <em>four</em> year old. It wasn&#8217;t meant to be particularly witty or deep and served no other purpose than venting some frustration at a moronic user handpicked from the weekly dozen who used to send me complaint emails back then. As such, I really have little inclination to open a debate around the content of this post, even less about a not-so-funny-at-all crack alluding to the use of nuclear weapons on civilian population. But feel free to keep  arguing on this page (just keep it somewhat courteous): I am all for spirited (if slightly pointless) debate.</p>
<p>For the record, I wrote about the topic in a <em>non-humorous</em> entry elsewhere on this blog:<br />
<a href="http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/08/06/anniversary/" rel="nofollow">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/08/06/anniversary/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toyotabedzrock</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539267</link>
		<dc:creator>toyotabedzrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539267</guid>
		<description>I agree with ur first paragraph, except I&#039;d like to point out that we had not broken the newest Japanese naval code before Pearl Harbor only the diplomatic code. Also the first Gulf War did provide a small boost to the economy. We where able to break most of the code by Jan. 1942.
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3403300822.html


Actually the 8-point plan is mostly about preventing Japan from aiding Germany. Only those two sentences talk about getting them to attack the US. 

You also seem to forget that Germany and Japan were in the process of committing the worst war crime in the history of the Human race. 

Also I am not in anyway against Japan, or the Japaneses people. I am lucky to not be old enough to remember any wars before the first Gulf War. I am also not a diehard patriot in anyway, the US has plenty of it&#039;s own faults and isn&#039;t always right in the actions it takes. I also find patriotism to be one of the two major problems in the world today, the other being extremism in any form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with ur first paragraph, except I&#8217;d like to point out that we had not broken the newest Japanese naval code before Pearl Harbor only the diplomatic code. Also the first Gulf War did provide a small boost to the economy. We where able to break most of the code by Jan. 1942.<br />
<a href="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3403300822.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3403300822.html</a></p>
<p>Actually the 8-point plan is mostly about preventing Japan from aiding Germany. Only those two sentences talk about getting them to attack the US. </p>
<p>You also seem to forget that Germany and Japan were in the process of committing the worst war crime in the history of the Human race. </p>
<p>Also I am not in anyway against Japan, or the Japaneses people. I am lucky to not be old enough to remember any wars before the first Gulf War. I am also not a diehard patriot in anyway, the US has plenty of it&#8217;s own faults and isn&#8217;t always right in the actions it takes. I also find patriotism to be one of the two major problems in the world today, the other being extremism in any form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maize5</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539254</link>
		<dc:creator>maize5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539254</guid>
		<description>Dear toyotabedzrock,

In response to your long-winded, jingoistic, misinformed and racist little post I find myself forced to correct you on a few things.

Firstly, we were intercepting message from the Japanese to their fleets preparing them for the attack at Pearl Harbour. Secondly, the attack was specifically provoked in order to get us in the war. Before I give you the proof of how, I will give you the why. After WWI the American Union&#039;s people went fanatically isolationist. They didn&#039;t want any more of their blood shed in wars between other countries. FDR had also promised in his campaign speeches that it would never happen again. The problem was that FDR knew ahead of time that the Nazis would become a direct threat to the US, but not fast enough. The reason it wouldn&#039;t happen fast enough for their liking is that the Great Depression was really kicking the crap out our union and prior to WWII, wars were a great way to jump-start the economy. As a side note, the reason that doesn&#039;t work anymore is the people have to believe that the war is just, and you have to win it. We haven&#039;t won anything since WWII, and you can look at Korea, Viet Nam, Gulf Wars one and two, the list goes on. What FDR needed was to get us in the war, and get the economy moving.

Now I&#039;ll tell you the how part. FDR commissioned a study to see what it would take to get the Japanese to attack us. This was because the Japanese had just signed a non-aggression treaty with the Germans during the Japanese&#039;s involvement with the Sino-Japanese war. FDR knew the Germans would be too late in attacking us to have a positive effect on the Depression, but the Japanese were right next door and could be provoked if done properly. See, prior to this Japan had been a very close friend of the US. The answer to this request was a response by Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum and became known as the McCollum Memo. In it, LCDR McCollum give an eight-point plan on how to provoke a Japanese attack on US shores, and spur the US people into supporting a war effort. In fact, McCollum stated, &quot;If by these means Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better. At all events we must be fully prepared to accept the threat of war&quot;.  This instigation was so well known that when Dewey was running against FDR in &#039;44 he found out about America’s ability to intercept Japan’s radio messages, and knew he could use this information to win against the him. Dewey had a series of speeches written to out FDR when Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George Marshall, persuaded him not to make the speeches. Japan had no idea we&#039;d cracked their codes at this point and Marshall convinced him that his speeches could have completely destroyed the US&#039; ability to win the war, so Dewey said nothing, and in November FDR was elected president for the fourth time.

This is all besides the fact that the Japanese literally had nothing left to fight back with by the time we dropped the bombs. The Kamakaze missions weren&#039;t for fun and honour, they were volunteers for missions where they would not have enough fuel for a return trip simply because Japan was out of oil. They were at the point of not having anything to power their war, and posed absolutely no threat. Again, this is all despite the fact that we provoked them into attacking us in the first place.

Your blatant ignorance is simply unforgivable in this day and age, and the only excuse is that your racism and patriotism has led you to deny the facts and only believe what makes you more comfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear toyotabedzrock,</p>
<p>In response to your long-winded, jingoistic, misinformed and racist little post I find myself forced to correct you on a few things.</p>
<p>Firstly, we were intercepting message from the Japanese to their fleets preparing them for the attack at Pearl Harbour. Secondly, the attack was specifically provoked in order to get us in the war. Before I give you the proof of how, I will give you the why. After WWI the American Union&#8217;s people went fanatically isolationist. They didn&#8217;t want any more of their blood shed in wars between other countries. FDR had also promised in his campaign speeches that it would never happen again. The problem was that FDR knew ahead of time that the Nazis would become a direct threat to the US, but not fast enough. The reason it wouldn&#8217;t happen fast enough for their liking is that the Great Depression was really kicking the crap out our union and prior to WWII, wars were a great way to jump-start the economy. As a side note, the reason that doesn&#8217;t work anymore is the people have to believe that the war is just, and you have to win it. We haven&#8217;t won anything since WWII, and you can look at Korea, Viet Nam, Gulf Wars one and two, the list goes on. What FDR needed was to get us in the war, and get the economy moving.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;ll tell you the how part. FDR commissioned a study to see what it would take to get the Japanese to attack us. This was because the Japanese had just signed a non-aggression treaty with the Germans during the Japanese&#8217;s involvement with the Sino-Japanese war. FDR knew the Germans would be too late in attacking us to have a positive effect on the Depression, but the Japanese were right next door and could be provoked if done properly. See, prior to this Japan had been a very close friend of the US. The answer to this request was a response by Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum and became known as the McCollum Memo. In it, LCDR McCollum give an eight-point plan on how to provoke a Japanese attack on US shores, and spur the US people into supporting a war effort. In fact, McCollum stated, &#8220;If by these means Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better. At all events we must be fully prepared to accept the threat of war&#8221;.  This instigation was so well known that when Dewey was running against FDR in &#8216;44 he found out about America’s ability to intercept Japan’s radio messages, and knew he could use this information to win against the him. Dewey had a series of speeches written to out FDR when Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George Marshall, persuaded him not to make the speeches. Japan had no idea we&#8217;d cracked their codes at this point and Marshall convinced him that his speeches could have completely destroyed the US&#8217; ability to win the war, so Dewey said nothing, and in November FDR was elected president for the fourth time.</p>
<p>This is all besides the fact that the Japanese literally had nothing left to fight back with by the time we dropped the bombs. The Kamakaze missions weren&#8217;t for fun and honour, they were volunteers for missions where they would not have enough fuel for a return trip simply because Japan was out of oil. They were at the point of not having anything to power their war, and posed absolutely no threat. Again, this is all despite the fact that we provoked them into attacking us in the first place.</p>
<p>Your blatant ignorance is simply unforgivable in this day and age, and the only excuse is that your racism and patriotism has led you to deny the facts and only believe what makes you more comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evyl Robot Michael</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539053</link>
		<dc:creator>Evyl Robot Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539053</guid>
		<description>dr. Dave, That was some really nice pwning right there!  I salute you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dr. Dave, That was some really nice pwning right there!  I salute you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toyotabedzrock</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-539023</link>
		<dc:creator>toyotabedzrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-539023</guid>
		<description>While I agree this guy is a moron, I find the last part of your letter upsetting, &quot;ask him to tell you these great stories of how, as a child during the war, he used to be sent on vacation to Hiroshima island with his sister&quot;.

While it was a terrible thing that the US did, I would like to remind you of what happened at Perl Harbor, especially the deception by the Japanese in the days prior to the attack. The killing of civilians, it is estimated that Japan killed more people than Germany, possibly 30 million. Then there was the cannibalism witnessed by POWs. And the very high death rate of American POWs, and the almost 100% death rate of Chinese POWs. Then there was the Comfort Stations. Need I go on. Then there where the experiments on POWs, the Death Ray, a big microwave like device.

Then lets also consider that had the US not dropped an atomic weapon, your lawyer friend would have likely died serving the Emperor as a suicide soldier or from famine. The US has helped protect Japan since. And now you are a economic power in the world. 

Don&#039;t get me wrong I wish we didn&#039;t resort to those methods, but it is likely that had we not obtained a complete surrender that your country might have ended up having insurgents running around like Afghanistan. The reason I say that is because of the wiliness of the Imperial soldiers to sacrifice themselves for military gain, and the fact that an invading army will never make enough friends in a country to completely expel extremists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree this guy is a moron, I find the last part of your letter upsetting, &#8220;ask him to tell you these great stories of how, as a child during the war, he used to be sent on vacation to Hiroshima island with his sister&#8221;.</p>
<p>While it was a terrible thing that the US did, I would like to remind you of what happened at Perl Harbor, especially the deception by the Japanese in the days prior to the attack. The killing of civilians, it is estimated that Japan killed more people than Germany, possibly 30 million. Then there was the cannibalism witnessed by POWs. And the very high death rate of American POWs, and the almost 100% death rate of Chinese POWs. Then there was the Comfort Stations. Need I go on. Then there where the experiments on POWs, the Death Ray, a big microwave like device.</p>
<p>Then lets also consider that had the US not dropped an atomic weapon, your lawyer friend would have likely died serving the Emperor as a suicide soldier or from famine. The US has helped protect Japan since. And now you are a economic power in the world. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong I wish we didn&#8217;t resort to those methods, but it is likely that had we not obtained a complete surrender that your country might have ended up having insurgents running around like Afghanistan. The reason I say that is because of the wiliness of the Imperial soldiers to sacrifice themselves for military gain, and the fact that an invading army will never make enough friends in a country to completely expel extremists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmm</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-25987</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-25987</guid>
		<description>and,..I was talking about Dr. Dave...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and,..I was talking about Dr. Dave&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmmm</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-25986</link>
		<dc:creator>hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-25986</guid>
		<description>What self satisfied bullshit. Most likely an alcoholic untreated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What self satisfied bullshit. Most likely an alcoholic untreated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr Dave</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-9370</link>
		<dc:creator>dr Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-9370</guid>
		<description>Wow, still reading around, David? didn&#039;t know my writing was so entrancing...
As for this particular trolling episode, if you keep reading around, you&#039;ll notice much, much more criticism exposed, without any similar sort of stomping from my end. Criticism, I can usually take, blunt moronism is a bit harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, still reading around, David? didn&#8217;t know my writing was so entrancing&#8230;<br />
As for this particular trolling episode, if you keep reading around, you&#8217;ll notice much, much more criticism exposed, without any similar sort of stomping from my end. Criticism, I can usually take, blunt moronism is a bit harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Russell</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-9369</link>
		<dc:creator>David Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-9369</guid>
		<description>Oh no, criticism, ME SMASH. How very... demonstrative.. of your non-AOLer [sic] IQ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, criticism, ME SMASH. How very&#8230; demonstrative.. of your non-AOLer [sic] IQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabley</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>WOO-HOO!!!!! That did it.  Thanks a ton MacManX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOO-HOO!!!!! That did it.  Thanks a ton MacManX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacManX</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8859</link>
		<dc:creator>MacManX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8859</guid>
		<description>Replace your copy of /wp-admin/menu-header.php with this one: http://trac.wordpress.org/file/trunk/wp-admin/menu-header.php (or the one from Dr. Dave&#039;s special version of WordPress).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Replace your copy of /wp-admin/menu-header.php with this one: <a href="http://trac.wordpress.org/file/trunk/wp-admin/menu-header.php" rel="nofollow">http://trac.wordpress.org/file/trunk/wp-admin/menu-header.php</a> (or the one from Dr. Dave&#8217;s special version of WordPress).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabley</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the feedback.  Any way to fix this sans shell access or w/o doing a fresh WP install?  Looks like there might only be one or two files altered by this patch.  Cheers,
Jabs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the feedback.  Any way to fix this sans shell access or w/o doing a fresh WP install?  Looks like there might only be one or two files altered by this patch.  Cheers,<br />
Jabs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacManX</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>MacManX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>Jabley, that&#039;s a derivative of bug # 902. A patch is available here: http://mosquito.wordpress.org/view.php?id=902

Alternatively, you could download Dr. Dave&#039;s special version of WordPress (direct from the WordPress CVS) here: http://unknowngenius.com/blog/wordpress/spam-karma/dev/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jabley, that&#8217;s a derivative of bug # 902. A patch is available here: <a href="http://mosquito.wordpress.org/view.php?id=902" rel="nofollow">http://mosquito.wordpress.org/view.php?id=902</a></p>
<p>Alternatively, you could download Dr. Dave&#8217;s special version of WordPress (direct from the WordPress CVS) here: <a href="http://unknowngenius.com/blog/wordpress/spam-karma/dev/" rel="nofollow">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/wordpress/spam-karma/dev/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jabley</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jabley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8854</guid>
		<description>Dr. Dave,
I can’t tell you how much I appreciate your SK plugin.  I’ve been using the 1.X series for about 10 days—just after I got my first flood of poker spam.  It has managed to catch about 150 spam comments so far, but a few trackback messages are coming through.  I would like to test out SK2 (per your observation that it is infinitely more effective), but I only get &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jabley.com/images/sk2.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the following&lt;/a&gt; in my WP admin section.  I’m going to go on and apologize profusely for my stupidity, because I’m sure the solution is buried somewhere obvious in your archives.  When you get a chance, I’d appreciate any suggestions that you may be able to offer as to what I may be doing wrong (other than generalized ignorance) .  Regards,
Jabley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Dave,<br />
I can’t tell you how much I appreciate your SK plugin.  I’ve been using the 1.X series for about 10 days—just after I got my first flood of poker spam.  It has managed to catch about 150 spam comments so far, but a few trackback messages are coming through.  I would like to test out SK2 (per your observation that it is infinitely more effective), but I only get <a href="http://www.jabley.com/images/sk2.jpg" rel="nofollow">the following</a> in my WP admin section.  I’m going to go on and apologize profusely for my stupidity, because I’m sure the solution is buried somewhere obvious in your archives.  When you get a chance, I’d appreciate any suggestions that you may be able to offer as to what I may be doing wrong (other than generalized ignorance) .  Regards,<br />
Jabley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Dave&#8217;s Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Copyright, copyleft and middle-ground&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8791</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Dave&#8217;s Blog  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Copyright, copyleft and middle-ground&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8791</guid>
		<description>[...] try as I might, I know I&#8217;m nowhere near that level of bitter, yet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] try as I might, I know I&#8217;m nowhere near that level of bitter, yet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Root</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8790</link>
		<dc:creator>Root</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8790</guid>
		<description>The exquisite irony is that if ever there was a candidate for bad karma purely on the grounds we didnt like him- he would be it. Jenn he doesn&#039;t know what he is talking about. And if he is a lawyer that makes it less likely that he knows. He knows Jack shit about software, its development, its use or its licensing. And certainly in this country litigants with reasonable and moderate tones are the ones you need to worry about. For example - on a point of law - there is no reference to *authority* ie an act or a substantive decided case. Nor is there any mention of jurisdiction. Underlying his case is a false premise - that there is a *right to comment*. There isnt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exquisite irony is that if ever there was a candidate for bad karma purely on the grounds we didnt like him- he would be it. Jenn he doesn&#8217;t know what he is talking about. And if he is a lawyer that makes it less likely that he knows. He knows Jack shit about software, its development, its use or its licensing. And certainly in this country litigants with reasonable and moderate tones are the ones you need to worry about. For example &#8211; on a point of law &#8211; there is no reference to *authority* ie an act or a substantive decided case. Nor is there any mention of jurisdiction. Underlying his case is a false premise &#8211; that there is a *right to comment*. There isnt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nacken</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8763</link>
		<dc:creator>nacken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8763</guid>
		<description>I applaud BC for giving us such a fun read and many good laughs ... ever thought of becoming a stand up comedian? or sit down .. lie down .. 

This guy reminds me of a certain lady in Fiji who wrote to the newspaper about how mad she was about getting SK1&#039;s  &quot;bad karma&#039; message ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud BC for giving us such a fun read and many good laughs &#8230; ever thought of becoming a stand up comedian? or sit down .. lie down .. </p>
<p>This guy reminds me of a certain lady in Fiji who wrote to the newspaper about how mad she was about getting SK1&#8217;s  &#8220;bad karma&#8217; message &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8744</link>
		<dc:creator>T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8744</guid>
		<description>That is the funniest thing I have read in a very long time.  

I can just imagine the sort of purile and inane original comment that he was trying to post on somebodies blog..  He was probably pissed as he thought it was terribly clever and took him ages to compose.  

Perhaps SK has a built in &quot;Stupid-o-meter&quot; that deletes moronic posts as well as potential SPAM comments..  Perhaps you can market this feature???  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the funniest thing I have read in a very long time.  </p>
<p>I can just imagine the sort of purile and inane original comment that he was trying to post on somebodies blog..  He was probably pissed as he thought it was terribly clever and took him ages to compose.  </p>
<p>Perhaps SK has a built in &#8220;Stupid-o-meter&#8221; that deletes moronic posts as well as potential SPAM comments..  Perhaps you can market this feature???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacManX</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8725</link>
		<dc:creator>MacManX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8725</guid>
		<description>Lol, that Troll has no clue what he&#039;s talking about.  If he did, he would know that all AOL users connect to the internet through proxies, and &quot;The number one cause for &#039;real&#039; false positives… Proxy servers do not agree with SK, SK doesn’t like proxies. This is deliberate: Most, if not all spammers use proxy servers to hide themselves when spreading their junk. Further more, it is also a very common trait of spammers to use &#039;pools&#039; of IPs to hit blogs, and thus optimize their operation. The problem breaks down to this: forcing SK to be nice to proxies (those that do IP masquerading, anyway) means relax the whole attitude toward IPs: not enforcing any form of consistency (e.g.: the same IP expected to fetch the comment form and submit it) and leaving the door open to a whole array of very basic dirty tricks that let spammer hide their tracks with much ease.&quot;  IOW, if you want to act like you know something, at least make an effort to know something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, that Troll has no clue what he&#8217;s talking about.  If he did, he would know that all AOL users connect to the internet through proxies, and &#8220;The number one cause for &#8216;real&#8217; false positives… Proxy servers do not agree with SK, SK doesn’t like proxies. This is deliberate: Most, if not all spammers use proxy servers to hide themselves when spreading their junk. Further more, it is also a very common trait of spammers to use &#8216;pools&#8217; of IPs to hit blogs, and thus optimize their operation. The problem breaks down to this: forcing SK to be nice to proxies (those that do IP masquerading, anyway) means relax the whole attitude toward IPs: not enforcing any form of consistency (e.g.: the same IP expected to fetch the comment form and submit it) and leaving the door open to a whole array of very basic dirty tricks that let spammer hide their tracks with much ease.&#8221;  IOW, if you want to act like you know something, at least make an effort to know something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8723</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8723</guid>
		<description>Dave, I would be very very scared if I were you.  This troll seems to know what he is talking about.

On another note, why can&#039;t I have my very own troll.  I would hug him and pet him and call him Trollie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I would be very very scared if I were you.  This troll seems to know what he is talking about.</p>
<p>On another note, why can&#8217;t I have my very own troll.  I would hug him and pet him and call him Trollie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr Dave</title>
		<link>http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/comment-page-1/#comment-8722</link>
		<dc:creator>dr Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unknowngenius.com/blog/archives/2005/04/17/angry-emails/#comment-8722</guid>
		<description>You got to be kidding me...

Who said once that &quot;Wits are but a glimpse, Evil may last, but only the Word of the Thick and Obtuse will outlive us all?&quot;

Oh wait... I think it was me. 
and I think you were the reason I just made that one up, too...

Now, I&#039;m gonna try to make it &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; easy for you, because apparently, what you make up for in obstination and redundancy, you clearly lack in basic common sense and reading ability:

The reason I initially deleted that URL was &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; out of some conspiratorial attempt to hide the ugly evidence of my failure, as a software writer. For that matter, and if that can put you at ease: I take entire responsibility for that unwanted interception of a somewhat legit comment and its meaning, with regard to the reliability of the, now wholly obsolete, version of a software I wrote on my free time to help my fellow bloggers. For what it&#039;s worth, actually, I&#039;ll gladly take on the claim that it was &lt;em&gt;purposefully&lt;/em&gt; programmed so as to stop &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; communications, in a vain attempt at raising the collective IQ bar of blog commenters the world over.

No, you see, the reason I deleted that URL, was out of pure unaltered human compassion for the poor miserable soul who exposed such level of aggressive dimwittedness in these emails.

I felt that, while exploiting these exchange for their pure gold entertainment value was within the admittedly very low standards of ethics where I hold this blog, it would be needlessly cruel to give even the slightest clue, as to the identity of its perpetrator: an individual no doubt crippled enough as it is by his inability to express his thoughts in anything else than a half-articulated flavour of aggressive legalese, whose horribly discordant and right-down beastial sounds tends to frighten away humans and animals alike. A pariah, a freak of nature, condemned to drift aimlessly on the blogosphere, irresistibly driven by his animal instincts to try and bite the hand off any creature foolish enough to take pity on his miserable appearance and communication skills.

For all these reasons, I removed both your name, your email and the URL of the blog where your attempt at commenting was &lt;s&gt;thwarted&lt;/s&gt; unfortunately stopped by Spam Karma.

But stupidity has no shame, it appears. And you have now come to reclaim your right at being exposed publicly and completely for the utter nitwit that you are.

Yet, I am &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; not going to insert that URL back.

And you know why? 

Well, first of all, because &lt;em&gt;you want it&lt;/em&gt;. and I am a mean motherfucker.

Secondly: because whoever else you dropped that pungent brand of corporal expression which passes off as communication in your corner of the world, just doesn&#039;t deserve the publicity, good or bad, of being associated with this pathetic exchange.

To conclude, I&#039;ll quickly draw the attention of our dear spectators over to the fact that there is very little that can be added to your recent comments, without regrettably diluting the pure exhilarating stupidity that oozes out of every other sentence. Such stuff needs to be taken raw and without additives, there&#039;s no other way. 

But if you really must get some sort of answer or counter-argument, I invite you to look at you hand (yea, the very thing you use to slap the trained monkey who types your comments on this blog), close all fingers but the thumb and the one right beside it. 
Now what you see is what, in our technical jargon, we call a &quot;representation of the number &lt;strong&gt;two&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;. Assisted with that useful concept in making the difference between &quot;first&quot; and &quot;second&quot;, you merely have to fetch a dictionary and look up the definition for &quot;degree&quot;. 

You should then be in possession of the all the elements necessary to comprehend this incredible notion we like to call &quot;second degree&quot;, it&#039;s quite brilliant, I assure you (I know it&#039;s a lot to take at a time: ask the monkey, he&#039;ll explain to you).

As for further replies to your increasingly pointless ululations, I reserve the right to stop caring without further notice, despite the simultaneous potential for anger release and good honest fun at a silly person&#039;s expense, depending on the advice of my psychiatrist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got to be kidding me&#8230;</p>
<p>Who said once that &#8220;Wits are but a glimpse, Evil may last, but only the Word of the Thick and Obtuse will outlive us all?&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh wait&#8230; I think it was me.<br />
and I think you were the reason I just made that one up, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m gonna try to make it <em>real</em> easy for you, because apparently, what you make up for in obstination and redundancy, you clearly lack in basic common sense and reading ability:</p>
<p>The reason I initially deleted that URL was <em>not</em> out of some conspiratorial attempt to hide the ugly evidence of my failure, as a software writer. For that matter, and if that can put you at ease: I take entire responsibility for that unwanted interception of a somewhat legit comment and its meaning, with regard to the reliability of the, now wholly obsolete, version of a software I wrote on my free time to help my fellow bloggers. For what it&#8217;s worth, actually, I&#8217;ll gladly take on the claim that it was <em>purposefully</em> programmed so as to stop <em>your</em> communications, in a vain attempt at raising the collective IQ bar of blog commenters the world over.</p>
<p>No, you see, the reason I deleted that URL, was out of pure unaltered human compassion for the poor miserable soul who exposed such level of aggressive dimwittedness in these emails.</p>
<p>I felt that, while exploiting these exchange for their pure gold entertainment value was within the admittedly very low standards of ethics where I hold this blog, it would be needlessly cruel to give even the slightest clue, as to the identity of its perpetrator: an individual no doubt crippled enough as it is by his inability to express his thoughts in anything else than a half-articulated flavour of aggressive legalese, whose horribly discordant and right-down beastial sounds tends to frighten away humans and animals alike. A pariah, a freak of nature, condemned to drift aimlessly on the blogosphere, irresistibly driven by his animal instincts to try and bite the hand off any creature foolish enough to take pity on his miserable appearance and communication skills.</p>
<p>For all these reasons, I removed both your name, your email and the URL of the blog where your attempt at commenting was <s>thwarted</s> unfortunately stopped by Spam Karma.</p>
<p>But stupidity has no shame, it appears. And you have now come to reclaim your right at being exposed publicly and completely for the utter nitwit that you are.</p>
<p>Yet, I am <em>still</em> not going to insert that URL back.</p>
<p>And you know why? </p>
<p>Well, first of all, because <em>you want it</em>. and I am a mean motherfucker.</p>
<p>Secondly: because whoever else you dropped that pungent brand of corporal expression which passes off as communication in your corner of the world, just doesn&#8217;t deserve the publicity, good or bad, of being associated with this pathetic exchange.</p>
<p>To conclude, I&#8217;ll quickly draw the attention of our dear spectators over to the fact that there is very little that can be added to your recent comments, without regrettably diluting the pure exhilarating stupidity that oozes out of every other sentence. Such stuff needs to be taken raw and without additives, there&#8217;s no other way. </p>
<p>But if you really must get some sort of answer or counter-argument, I invite you to look at you hand (yea, the very thing you use to slap the trained monkey who types your comments on this blog), close all fingers but the thumb and the one right beside it.<br />
Now what you see is what, in our technical jargon, we call a &#8220;representation of the number <strong>two</strong>&#8220;. Assisted with that useful concept in making the difference between &#8220;first&#8221; and &#8220;second&#8221;, you merely have to fetch a dictionary and look up the definition for &#8220;degree&#8221;. </p>
<p>You should then be in possession of the all the elements necessary to comprehend this incredible notion we like to call &#8220;second degree&#8221;, it&#8217;s quite brilliant, I assure you (I know it&#8217;s a lot to take at a time: ask the monkey, he&#8217;ll explain to you).</p>
<p>As for further replies to your increasingly pointless ululations, I reserve the right to stop caring without further notice, despite the simultaneous potential for anger release and good honest fun at a silly person&#8217;s expense, depending on the advice of my psychiatrist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
